Jump to content
The Emma-Watson.net Forum

ShipOfFools

Members
  • Content Count

    370
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ShipOfFools

  1. I didn't mean that. I just mean, she has a life of her own. She doesn't have to put on the actress hat all the time. Sometimes she just wants to be private and be with her friends and have a private social life.
  2. I'd like to see her in a comedy. Something that is just plain downright silly. I know she's trying to be taken seriously as an actress, but Jim Carrey and Robin Williams have both done serious roles, so there's no reason why Emma can't make us laugh.
  3. To be honest, I've met a lot of celebrities, and they are just people like you and me. I'd rather know the Emma that is on the screen, instead of having her annoyed at me for wasting her time.
  4. I think Emma should do a comedy. A lot of actors branch out and do different roles, and end up with two different fanbases. This could be a good thing.
  5. I haven't seen it. I want to see it, though. After The Perks, any role that Emma is in would be a letdown. She just nailed that role.
  6. I really want to go see this movie, even if Emma has little screen time.
  7. I'll have to see if my local theater will have it. I really want to go see it!
  8. Err, Emma Watson was never Hermoine.
  9. All of that cuteness had to come from somewhere!.... .... Hey, I'm just sayin'!
  10. Oh, give me a break! If all of the top paid actors left the business because they were filthy rich, we would have no new movies. Actors act, because they like to act. And if Emma passed on this role, it's not because of the nudity. Have some respect for Emma and her choice, rather than just thinking about her slutting it up in a film. If she wanted to do that, she would do it...that is clearly not her. Emma has some class, people.
  11. Ugh. Just...ugh. These are three responses I have to people that think Emma should star in 50 Shades of Grey. 1. It is not a good trilogy of novels. Like it's been said before, it's smut...and not even well written smut. It's not going to be a good series of films, it's going to be a disaster, aimed at those who are obsessed with sex and the media. It's also going to be completely controversial, and someone like Emma Watson wouldn't want to be in the center of all that controversy. 2. Emma has shown that she is uncomfortable in sexual roles before. That doesn't mean that she is uncomfortab
  12. I just feel it's a poor choice for her to go back to kids' movies. Emma is trying to break out of the 'child actor' roles. How is it possible that she should do another Disney film? I mean, maybe a one-off...but she needs to stand on her own two feet.
  13. Okay, now that is a bit ridiculous. My biggest concern is that Emma would have trouble doing sex scenes...but not the fact that her audience can't grow with her. I am a huge Christina Aguilera fan. What happened to her when she started doing more adult music? Her young audience left her, and the audience she had stayed with her...her primary fanbase is in their mid 20's to early 30's. If children liked child Emma, they don't have to like the movies past Deathly Hallows. It's not like a 9 year old would be allowed to see Perks or Marilyn, for example. Marilyn is rated R.
  14. That doesn't explain my second comment. If she is uncomfortable getting into her undies on screen, how is she supposed to have sex on screen? And it's not vanilla sex, either....
  15. No she should not do this! Enough kids movies!
×
×
  • Create New...