Jump to content


Photo

Image Posting


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Watson Duerre

Watson Duerre

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 09 March 2016 - 04:10 AM

So i've seen quite a few comments bashing emmawatsondaily.org/ and thought I'd give my input. 

I myself use HQ/UHQ stock image sites. These are sites that the admin of that website likely uses as well. Photographers who work for certain companies are allowed to upload their images to the sites and sell them for a comission. That means they make a certain amount of money every time someone buys an image through the website. I think what emmawatsondaily.org does is use lower priced image sites - there are some that only cost $3 to $10 per photo instead of the usual $50 to $300. And I do not think they're hacking or illegally distributing images. I'm actually tired of seeing that issue debated around here. It's perfectly legal to watermark an image you don't want anyone else stealing as long as there are disclaimers on your site letting the public know that you are not the photographer and are not making profit off it. 



#2 Ashley

Ashley

    Extreme Poster

  • Water
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,196 posts
  • LocationKentucky, USA

Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:26 PM

I've never seen anyone on here complaining about the site?

#3 Elena

Elena

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,311 posts
  • LocationRomania

Posted 17 March 2016 - 08:55 PM

I've never seen anyone on here complaining about the site?

we did that a million light years ago


sw70v4.jpg


#4 Ashley

Ashley

    Extreme Poster

  • Water
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,196 posts
  • LocationKentucky, USA

Posted 01 April 2016 - 03:53 PM

Oh well then this topic is super irrelevant ?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users