Watson Duerre Posted March 9, 2016 Share Posted March 9, 2016 So i've seen quite a few comments bashing emmawatsondaily.org/ and thought I'd give my input. I myself use HQ/UHQ stock image sites. These are sites that the admin of that website likely uses as well. Photographers who work for certain companies are allowed to upload their images to the sites and sell them for a comission. That means they make a certain amount of money every time someone buys an image through the website. I think what emmawatsondaily.org does is use lower priced image sites - there are some that only cost $3 to $10 per photo instead of the usual $50 to $300. And I do not think they're hacking or illegally distributing images. I'm actually tired of seeing that issue debated around here. It's perfectly legal to watermark an image you don't want anyone else stealing as long as there are disclaimers on your site letting the public know that you are not the photographer and are not making profit off it. Link to post Share on other sites
Ashley Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I've never seen anyone on here complaining about the site? Link to post Share on other sites
Elena Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 I've never seen anyone on here complaining about the site?we did that a million light years ago Link to post Share on other sites
Ashley Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Oh well then this topic is super irrelevant ? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now