Joanne P. Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Yeah, I know it can take a while in other countries too... DO you think that they are going to use subtitles or to dub the movie ? In France most of the movies are dubbed, but I will manage to find a movie theater where I can watch it in English I think subtitles are much better ! Em41590, can't wait to her her American accent neither !! Link to post Share on other sites
relevancy Posted January 21, 2012 Share Posted January 21, 2012 (edited) Ah I cannot wait to see this. Emma and Logan together. The stills look wonderful. Edited January 21, 2012 by infinitums Link to post Share on other sites
~*Skittlez*~ Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 Yes she is going to be in it. Source : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1659337/ Link to post Share on other sites
cbmac12 Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 December!? What is the deal? This was a what 6 week movie to make? Why are they waiting so long to release it? Ahh well, will be around my birthday so cool present for me yeppers, bring on Emmas American, PITTSBURGH accent Link to post Share on other sites
KS987 Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I've read it might be December. But last December was just last month. This means we'll have to wait for almost a year for Perks to come out. I do hope we'll at least get the trailer a lot more sooner than that. Yes she is going to be in it. Source : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1659337/ Emma was confirmed to play Sam in Perks early last year. They've even already filmed the movie. We are just waiting for it to come out now, which apparently won't be for a while. Link to post Share on other sites
Elena Posted January 27, 2012 Share Posted January 27, 2012 I'm so mad, it's like a cold shower, they get you all excited for the movie then leave you with nothing than stills. utterly disappointing. Link to post Share on other sites
TK-976 Posted February 16, 2012 Share Posted February 16, 2012 Am I the only one who's iffy about this Logan kid playing Charlie? Link to post Share on other sites
Rena Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 when is a trailer coming out Link to post Share on other sites
Rena Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Am I the only one who's iffy about this Logan kid playing Charlie? yeah i second that, he just doesnt fit the part.i wish someone... i guess less well known was cast Link to post Share on other sites
trixie Posted February 20, 2012 Share Posted February 20, 2012 And I just want to see this film, like now.. Link to post Share on other sites
Junkie. Posted February 21, 2012 Share Posted February 21, 2012 And I just want to see this film, like now..same here. Link to post Share on other sites
trixie Posted February 24, 2012 Share Posted February 24, 2012 Don't know if this is old news, but this was posted on "Hypeable".com And it was the first time visiting that site b/c of the news about JK Rowling releasing a new book, and then I saw this: The popular book Perks of Being A Wallflower was adapted for film last year and is due to be released sometime in 2012 by Summit. But now there’s been a roadbump: The film received a ‘R’ rating from the United States’ MPAA, which alienates many of the potential moviegoers who’ve read the book. So Summit intends to appeal the decision. Rope of Silicon notes that the film was rated ‘R’ for “teen drug and alcohol use, and some sexual references.†Larry Richman, a well-sourced movie writer, says the film’s director Stephen Chbosky has intended all along for the film to be rated PG-13. Would you see the film even if it were rated R? Is it an issue Summit should be concerned with? Parents may not allow their kids to see it. Emma Watson plays Sam, Logan Lerman plays Charlie, and Nina Dobrev plays Candance. Link to post Share on other sites
TK-976 Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Just read that it got the R rating. I was seriously doubting how good this movie will be but now I'm actually stoked about it. The R rating means they aren't cutting much out and that's awesome Link to post Share on other sites
cbmac12 Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Dont be too excited yet-remember HBP (or was it Order shoot cant remember! Lol) got rated PG and really should have been PG-13...anyway point is they could easily change it back...plus last I heard this was to be released in fall and now I am hearing it could be as late as Nov/Dec...there is still a chance they release it as PG-13 like Hunger Games...Emma is in it and they know her fanbase will be alot of under 17. But who knows what will happen! Link to post Share on other sites
TK-976 Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Dont be too excited yet-remember HBP (or was it Order shoot cant remember! Lol) got rated PG and really should have been PG-13...anyway point is they could easily change it back...plus last I heard this was to be released in fall and now I am hearing it could be as late as Nov/Dec...there is still a chance they release it as PG-13 like Hunger Games...Emma is in it and they know her fanbase will be alot of under 17. But who knows what will happen! I know the studio and producers aren't happy with that rating. The book itself is on the mature side even though it is a teen book. I just hope they don't dumb down the themes because they want to target a younger crowd (even though thats probably the case). Plus, it would be good to see Emma in a more mature role. Link to post Share on other sites
cbmac12 Posted February 25, 2012 Share Posted February 25, 2012 Oh no I hear you trust me I do...but I think moneywise a PG-13 rating will win out-movies want money and the PG13 crowd is who will pay it. Guess we will have to wait and see what happens! Link to post Share on other sites
jayhawk Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) I know the studio and producers aren't happy with that rating. The book itself is on the mature side even though it is a teen book. I just hope they don't dumb down the themes because they want to target a younger crowd (even though thats probably the case). Plus, it would be good to see Emma in a more mature role.I'm not sure mature is the right word. She's still playing a teenager. I was always curious to see the rating for this. Even without any sex it would have been hard to get a PG-13 rating with the amount of drugs and overall theme of the book. The story behind Charlie's... issues, would be hard to do correctly without the R rating. I guess we'll have to see how much Chbosky and the studio are willing to water it down to get the, potentially, more profitable rating. The books been out long enough, 13 years, that the majority of it's fans are old enough to see an R-rated movie anyway. Edited February 27, 2012 by jayhawk Link to post Share on other sites
TK-976 Posted February 27, 2012 Share Posted February 27, 2012 (edited) I'm not sure mature is the right word. She's still playing a teenager. I was always curious to see the rating for this. Even without any sex it would have been hard to get a PG-13 rating with the amount of drugs and overall theme of the book. The story behind Charlie's... issues, would be hard to do correctly without the R rating. I guess we'll have to see how much Chbosky and the studio are willing to water it down to get the, potentially, more profitable rating. The books been out long enough, 13 years, that the majority of it's fans are old enough to see an R-rated movie anyway.True, maybe not character age wise, but I was referring more towards the theme of the movie. Edited February 27, 2012 by TK-976 Link to post Share on other sites
KS987 Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 What they could do is go for PG-13 for the theatrical release, then had the unedited version on DVD. Link to post Share on other sites
ShipOfFools Posted February 28, 2012 Share Posted February 28, 2012 I am over 17, and a lot of Emma's fans are (I was 19 when I started reading Harry Potter, and now I'm 29), so it's not necessarily a measure of age. The film will do well regardless if there is an R rating. Link to post Share on other sites
KS987 Posted March 6, 2012 Share Posted March 6, 2012 I am over 17, and a lot of Emma's fans are (I was 19 when I started reading Harry Potter, and now I'm 29), so it's not necessarily a measure of age. The film will do well regardless if there is an R rating. Indeed. I myself am 25. Not to mention that Emma herself is going to be 22 this year. They seem to want it PG-13 because Chbosky wants teenagers to see it, which is why they are appealing. Link to post Share on other sites
ShipOfFools Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Indeed. I myself am 25. Not to mention that Emma herself is going to be 22 this year. They seem to want it PG-13 because Chbosky wants teenagers to see it, which is why they are appealing. I can understand it. It's a book for teenagers, mostly. I read it as an adult, but I am not everyone. Link to post Share on other sites
cbmac12 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Even I myself believe going after a PG 13 rating,is wise-alot of movie goers are teens-todays economy is def forcing young adults like myself to think more of where to spend their money...I dont see many movies in theaters-I watched DH 2 multiple times ( but that was special ) and since then has seen Woman in Black and thats it. We plan on seeing Hunger Games but other than that, I will only watch Emma and Ruperts movies. Dan if they are good like WiB was, I would go see too. Link to post Share on other sites
dookdookdook Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 The appeal was successful, and Perks has been granted a PG-13 rating without having to cut the film. Link to post Share on other sites
cbmac12 Posted March 9, 2012 Share Posted March 9, 2012 Congrats to them!!!! bring it on!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now