Jump to content
The Emma-Watson.net Forum

Rose

Members
  • Content Count

    199
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rose

  1. That's the funny thing about it, is it really wasn't about nothing. The creators of Seinfeld read an article about the show in a New York newspaper and in the article it said the show was about nothing so they decided to use this description in the show. As it turns out it is not a show about nothing but a show about everything. Even the most mundane things.

     

    A few of the things I like about Seinfeld is one, it wasn't really topical so it holds up over time unlike a show like Friends or All in the Family. And two, Jerry and Larry's motto of no hugging and no learning. It was all about the humor and the jokes. The show was never not funny. It never got serious or self important like so many comedies try to do with their "very special" episodes.

     

    Jerry and Larry really had no idea what they were doing which is what made the show great. They didn't know what the rules and or conventions of television or sit coms were. Actually they originally wanted to do it as a single camera shoot with no studio audience or laugh track which was very uncommon at the time. But NBC said no on that but NBC did see the potential of the show and stuck with it when it was a ratings bomb. NBC has been very good in the past in nurturing shows with poor ratings that were done well such as Seinfeld and Cheers.

     

    At the time it was normal for sit coms to have a structure of two or three separate story lines and to be joke, joke, joke and then have a heart close (a sweet or touching ending). But Seinfeld totally did away with that structure by having jokes all the way through as evidenced with closings such as:

     

    Jerry: Wow! What'd she say?

    George: She told me to "Go to hell!" and I took the bus home.

     

    Seinfeld also popularized the tying together of seemingly disparate story lines beginning with The Marine Biologist. The show broke new ground in a genre that had gotten quite stale. It really did change the game.

     

     

    I had no idea, that they picked up that "show about nothing" line. Nice little info:) well i think it is both, it is really about everything ( thousand-dollar-cake, death, books you cannot give back...) and nothing, because most of the time they make so much talk about nothing ;)

    btw i love the bass "music"

  2. I thought Ricky Gervais was better last year.. the whole Charlie Sheen and gay scientologists jokes were a bit old..and an easy target.

    Tina Fey and Steve Carell were hilarious, I loved that Colin Firth won Best Actor, I wanted Helena Bonham-Carter or Mila Kunis to win for Best Supporting Actress though :doh: Thank God Lea Michele and Jennifer Love Hewitt didnt win!

    I liked Christian Bales accepting speech and I didnt like Robert Deniros speech..so awkward and I think some bad writer wrote it for him.(Did he really mention Megan Fox??)

    I was hoping for Michelle Williams to win, but I guess Natalie Portman will win everything this year!

     

    All in all I really liked the show and I loved some of the dresses: Mila Kunis, Kyra Sedgwick and Catherine Zeta-Jones looked STUNNING

  3. It´s a shame that the Hollywood Studios avoided her at the end of her career, there were lots of rumors about her and her husband..

     

    I think she was a gorgeous, kind and talented actress who worked her way to Hollywoos success! She was great in "Girl..Interrupted"! In interviews she alway seemed so nice and down to earth..

×
×
  • Create New...