Jump to content
The Emma-Watson.net Forum

KS987

Members
  • Content Count

    769
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KS987

  1. Oh, this will take some time. I stopped reading "her" FB-messages month ago, because they where all just old quotes. And remember: she only answered 7-8 questions, then the "new invention" dried out and was replaced by quotes, you can also read on the front page of Emma-Watson.net So I stopped reading. On the next day with snowfall I will look into that to answer your question.

     

     

    As Jo already mentioned earlier, Emma had to work on her other projects for the past several months, such as promote Perks and film Noah. We were already told months ago that it would be a while before she had time to answer them again. What exactly do you want from her?

  2. Now that Emma is in Iceland and is beginning to film her part in Noah, I hope we get more news and information on it. So far we've been hearing more about a project she's not involved with (Fifty Shades of Grey) than about this project that she IS involved with(Noah).

     

    I hope she enjoys filming Noah as well. :)

  3. Emma has been tweeting frequently recently, communicating with Evanna Lynch and Emma Forrest and mention that reading for Noah began recently. She has also been posting quotes from herself on facebook as well. :)

  4. I have some new questions for Emma:

     

    1) What drew you into the Bling Ring, and what was it like to play Nicki?

    2) Would you do a film adaptation of a non-Potter JK Rowling novel?

    3) What's the status on Your Voice's In My Head since David Yates had to leave the project?

    4) What inspired you to participate in your newest project, Noah? Speaking of which, do you still have all those bibles that were sent to you long ago? :P

    5) What types of characters, that you haven't played already, would you really like to play and what type of film would you really like to do?

  5. Emma answers question 8:

     

    Q:What advice would you give to your nine year old self?

     

    A:Emma: I think I would have asked more questions of some of the amazing actors on the Potter films – Maggie Smith, Michael Gambon, Gary Oldman, Emma Thompson, Helena Bonham Carter, Kenneth Branagh – everyone – but I was only nine!

  6. Question 7:

     

     

    Q: What’s the best advice anyone has ever given you regarding fame?

     

    A: Emma: My mum said to me very early on in my career, “Never give anyone information that you aren’t comfortable discussing at any time, anywhere and with anyone – once you open the door on a subject it’s very difficult to close it.†That is very true and I am a very private person. It's not always easy to follow but I try to keep it in mind. A film critic also once told me that acting was unlike any other in the entertainment industry – an actors job is to tell other people’s stories; to suspend an audiences disbelief and make them believe you are who you are portraying. That job is made almost impossible if your audience know too much about you, the actor, as a person. That has always stayed with me and the older I get the more I see the wisdom in it. However, as much as I might want to do that, I have to acknowledge that it’s not totally possible with the way my career turned out! People have watched me grow up and I think Harry Potter became more famous than I or I think anyone ever anticipated.

  7. I think this whole thing is ridiculous and goes to show how pathetic our society is. It's not Emma's dog to begin with, so she shouldn't even be involved in this discussion in the first place. Secondly, the dog was dyed as part of a cancer research project with a harmless substance that doesn't hurt the dog in any way, so once again non-issue.

     

     

    Dog Where did they get the idea that dogs are being used as accessories from this? By that logic owning a pet in the first place is using the animal as an accessory, because it had no say in that decision either. Hell, let's go further and say that people must be using babies as accessories rather than human beings because they dress them up in outfits to be cute with the baby having no say in the decision whatsoever? And they are human beings who are aware, or at least will be aware, of what they were forced to wear, and you know what? They will just be mildly embarassed or even laugh at it. The dog's feelings aren't going to be hurt since it does not have a human brain and limited color vision, so it doesn't know, or care, about how it looks.

     

    Again, much ado about nothing. Not to mention, didn't people give Emma a hard time for cutting her hair because THEY demanded that Emma keep her hair long because they wanted her to be Hermione in real life? So it's perfectly fine to force her to keep a certain appearance and treat her like an accessory used to bring a fictional character "to life"?

     

    And once again people are using the "why don't celebrities give their money to charity with their wealth" excuse. Emma's probably donated her share already. This is just to give other people a chance to get involved and contribute. It's just that these people don't want to pay, and decide to spin it around to justify it to themselves.

     

     

    And people who are happy to see Emma get "criticized" for this rather than "treated like a God", open your damn eyes. This isn't constructive criticism, these comments are just plain nasty and cruel written by irrational, psychotic, angry people and all over Emma walking someone else's harmlessly dyed dog. How can you defend this insanity?

  8. Again tabloids suck...I wish people understood that tabloids are 90% of the time lies.

     

     

    They are at it again:

     

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2163781/Emma-Watsons-wizard-wheeze-dyes-puppy-PINK.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

     

    First of all, they get two major things wrong right away

     

    1) It's not Emma's dog, It's one of her friends.

     

    2) It was dyed as part of a cancer research project, not as a "fashion trend"

     

    And since the dog isn't even being harmed in the first place, what's the issue? Sadly people will probably believe this crap as always and it will spread like cancer. Already people are going nuts over these, even after realizing that the dog isn't harmed at all. There's fighting for animal rights and just plain lunacy.

  9. Exactly.

    We are all sick of (the Daily Mail in particular) always putting "What would Hermione say?" whenever they write an article about Emma. So this question was re-worded to poke fun at people like that - they really need to get a grip and realise that Emma is Emma and Hermione ISN'T A REAL PERSON.

     

    :)

     

    We're talking about a paper that believes(or at least tries to convince people) to this day that Emma was the face of Chanel somewhere between 2007 and 2009 when it never, ever, happened. It's obvious that they aren't in touch with reality.

×
×
  • Create New...