Jump to content
The Emma-Watson.net Forum

Will

Forum Moderators
  • Content Count

    2,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Will

  1. First of all, where are you from? xD

     

    Too is used in two ways (as far I know):

    - To express an excessive quantity: Too small, too different, too high, too much, etc.

    - Instead of "also": I'm a person too; you like that too.

     

    To is used in several ways:

    - To convert a verb to the infinitive: to be, to have, to do...

    - To indicate a direction: I go to school, you go to your home...

    - To indicate a purpose: I'm posting here to help you, he likes to go there to eat some icecream...

     

    You can learn more about the "to" in here.

  2. That doesn't make sense. Animals do feel love. There are parrots that mate for life. Obvisouly you don't know much about animal behavior. I'm sorry but it's the truth. :\ Again, I don't mean to insult anyone but... Parrots are one of the animals that mate for life. Once they find a pairing, that's there mate. They do things like hug, kiss, embrace each other, hunt together... if you can't see that as a relationship then I dunno what to tell you.

    Animals don't feel love. Instead of judging people, show me proofs you're right. Parrots are one of the animals that mate for life? So what? Is that love? It isn't. Parrots, as many other birds, have to migrate constantly, raise their childs and establish territories; so the act of attracting mates would be lost time. They don't have only one mate because of love, they do because it's the way they can keep their offspring.

     

    If a child is brought up in a home where homosexuality is looked down upon and he had subconsciously made that choice don't you think it would be hard for him to live in that household? If someone was born with the biological tendency to be left handed and made the subconscious choice but wanted to play guitar don't you think it would be harder for him then for someone who was right handed? What I speak of is a theory and a psychology biological experiment that was done.

    I don't know if it's because my english is not that good or it's not, but I don't see a connection of what I said and what you said.

     

    I don't understand why you press hate on someone who is just different. That is NOT what Jesus wanted. Correct?

    No one has said we hate homosexuals.

     

    The things to take literally are the historical values that are located in the Bible that we have found to be slightly true. Such as the gospels which are located in the New Testament. Other than that as you have pointed out the Bible is mostly tales to make people more obedient or to give them some kind of relief. However you most certainly cannot believe that a man can live to be 500 or that you can never get a divorce or any of those things. If you do not follow every rule but follow others, then that is what I call being hypercritical. Saying homosexuality is wrong and not reading where Paul said it wasn't wrong but only unclean is just ... I don't know. I don't want to insult anyone. Just know there is contraindication in the book because it was written by men. Many different men over a vast period of time. The stories are mostly legend and folklore much like ancient Greece myth. At one time they believed it and what's to say there aren't many Gods? We won't know.

    Well, that paragraph is interesting. Not because I'm in an awkward position, but I thought you knew about the Bible at least a little.

    - There are proof that the history in the Bible is actually real, not tales (history of Judea, the Kings, Egypt, existence of the prophets).

    - People lived more than 500 years in that time (Genesis); but the Bible isn't the only book that claims people lived that long, you can find several secular books in several acient culture. But why people lived that long? Note the factors that shorten the life span of men (climate and disease mostly), at the time (again, the time of Genesis) the world was young, the climate was almost perfect and there weren't much diseases. In addition, man's life span is gradually declining, and you know that.

    - There's not contraindications in the Bible. If you claim there is, maybe you have to consider the time factor and the concept factor.

     

    BY THE WAY! I like your signature picture xD

  3. Full Metal Alchemist all the way. Also, I like Tennis no Oujisama (Prince of Tennis). I used to watch a lot of anime on TV such as Cyber Marionette, Pokemon, Digimon, one about football, and a couple more.

  4. You're using the Bible literally again.

    The Bible is a collection of books; there are poetic books, historical books, prophetic books, evangelic books, etc.. Meaning, there are portions in the Bible that we have to take it literally.

     

    About the "animal aren't gay, they don't feel love" statement, I already posted something making the clarification...

    I saw my mistake over there, but I meant with animals don't feel love that you can't use animals as an example of if the homosexuality is wrong or right. Plus, someone said that love is love and, based in this, how could homosexuality be bad then. Yes, it's a fact that animals have sex with another animals of same sex, but also they could "have sex" with some inanimated object. They do that due to their need to procreate and keep their species; no because they feel attached. Therefore, the "gay animals thing" is irrelevant in this topic.

    Anyways...

     

    Now, this being said, you could have been gay just as easily as you are straight. It all depends on the born ingredients and the environment.

    That's conflicting. You're saying that x could be A as easily as x could be B, but then you say it all depends on the born ingredients and the environment. That only can be true if there were the same amount of chance of being gay or heterosexual, in an environment that rejects gays, for moral, religious or biological (living things feel the need to preserve their species).

  5. Err not really. At least not for a female celebrity for what i know of.

    Oh, you're right; you convinced me [/sarcasm]

     

    Nah, I'm kidding... Anyways, as far I know, and generalizing, guys are more interested on how the female celebrity looks than what she does. But girls are interested about her life in general. That makes that girls spend more time reading about the celebrity than guys would.

     

    Of course, it's just my opinion.

  6. I don't know the right answer, but I think that...

     

    - Girls tend to be obsessed about somebody (celebrity in this case) more than most guys do.

    - There are more girls than guys in the world.

    - A lot of girls feel the need to share their thoughts and feeling with another people; more than guys do(usually).

  7. Nooooo man xD Two of my friends go there though. I really wanted to go there a few years ago, but I decided against applying. I'm going to Kutztown University.

    Ah ok, nevermind then xD. I'm seriously thinking on going there (transferred). Well, I hope you girls get well on college!

  8. Most people use about the 90% of the "brain power" (acording to some studies I've read), so I don't think that could change something in a notable way. However, I think one of the biggest problems that people is feeling their brains aren't 100% is the multitasking thing. Nowadays, people try to focus their mind in a ton of things, and eventually their brains have been conditioned to "fragment" themselves in several tasks. That's what I think.

×
×
  • Create New...