Jonny Carinthia

As I said: I recognise a awful dress or dress-combination if I see one... And her "dress" at the globes was the lowpoint of a row of wrong, creepy outfits, not fitting her style, her body and her image..... And Playboy: I think I have to remember you, that the pictured femals are removing their fabrics volutarily and not on gunpoint. So maybe you should blame them.

Dan directing Emma - that would mean war on set....... Please be reasonable.

No, awful combinations trousers + something and dresses, not made for her much-to-slim body are hilarious..... Her mother should not ban her to be in Playboy (like the story goes), but to wear creepy outfits.

Then Emma or her advisors had a bad taste lately..... I cannot understand why she is selling her with her outfits under her value....

I recognise a awfull dress, when I see one.... That's enough.

You have no idea....

I was for a second near to say: "If you have courage, show me...."

Happy now?

Her legs, yes.... - WAIT A MINUTE - I would never be so disrespectful and look otherwere then in her eyes.....

Any?????????????????

That's maybe a problem, asking "cooler" questions. I think, her interviews are all staged, means, no "bad surprises" for her. And you say it right, the interview with Blasberg is more a chat with a old friend over a cup of coffee hot chocolate, talking about times gone by. She should have more courage to do the real stuff - this is a "fluffy bunny rabbit"-style of interview and, heavens, she is nearly 24. So no need to treat her like 11 year old Emma anymore in interviews....

Unfortunatly it's the creep who has the money and the projects.... and not easy, if you are a shy, beautiful young actress and a creep has a crush on you........

Yes, Emma, we know... your eyes..... Let your eyes flash and you can wear whatever you want.

Hmmm.... everything better then the catastrophy from the Globes.....

I hope she wears a nice dress and not a wired trousers/dress combination again.....

I could explain it to you, why she is doing that movie - but I will not start arguing again and say only: Go, Emma, and show us your talent in a dramatic movie. After all I am still waiting for that..... I think, the "casting couch" ist still very common in Hollywood and even in the british film industry. Emma, I grant her that, is certainly not jumping on this couch, so this is why it takes so long to get a demanding leading part in a movie.

Emma is Emma - right. And - oh, a pic without photoshop.

As I said: crush, crush, crush......

Well, it might be € 600.000,-- befor taxes, but still.... even € 300.000,-- are much money...... And Weinstein... well, bodylanguage says it all...

You're welcome! (My kitchen-scales was a little but surprised, but anyway.....)

Harvey Weinstein must definitly have a crush on her.... € 600.000,-- (or approx. $ 500.000,--) as salary for Emma for a movie, which can not be easely sold to her HP-fan-family, is much money.

1,2 kg, to be exact.

I am not harsh to her; I am simply disappointed with the written part, because she had no better ideas...... And beeing interviewed by Blasberg is simply stupid, it is like "Oh, write the interview and send it to me to read it. If it is ok, we have no need to meet. Derek."

It is no big deal; I just think she could have done more out of this instead only making "interviews" with her closest friends...... And her interview should have been made by a real independend journalist and not by buddy Blasberg. But as I said, if you like it..... be happy. I forgot two more scans yesterday.... Sorry for the poor quality, but it was difficult to get the heavy mag in my scanner.... Oh, and of course they announced, that she is editing "the whole issue"....

Scan III